Journal article

Dealing with Cumulative Biodiversity Impacts in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A New Frontier for Conservation Planning

AL Whitehead, H Kujala, BA Wintle

Conservation Letters | WILEY | Published : 2017

Abstract

Biodiversity impact assessments under threatened species legislation often focus on individual development proposals at a single location, usually for a single species, leading to inadequate assessments of multiple impacts that accumulate over large spatial scales for multiple species. Regulations requiring ad-hoc assessments can lead to “death by a thousand cuts,” where biodiversity is degraded by many small impacts that individually do not appear to threaten species’ persistence. Spatial prioritization methods can improve the efficiency of decision-making by explicitly considering cumulative impacts of multiple proposed developments on multiple species over large spatial scales. We present..

View full abstract

University of Melbourne Researchers

Grants

Awarded by Australian Research Council


Funding Acknowledgements

NERP Decisions Hub supported this work. Wintle was supported by ARC Future Fellowship (FT100100819). Carolyn Cameron motivated and instigated the study. Simon Banks, Nicole Matthews, Hana McDonald, Jess Miller, Erin Pears (AG-DotE), Tahlia Rose, Simon Taylor, Sarah Woods (WA-DPC), Catherine Garlick (WA-OEPA), Bryce Bunny, Nicholas Dufty, Leo Peter, Aidan Power (WA-DoP), David Mitchell, and Christina Ramahlo (WA-DPaW) all provided data, knowledge and direction. Three anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments.